ArticleOpen veterinary journal2025
Antimicrobial resistance of
Article in Open veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Otitis frequently affects dogs. Underlying diseases and predisposing factors affect the otic environment, thereby causing bacterial proliferation. One of the most isolated species in cases of otitis is the Aim: The objective of this study was to determine the existence of antimicrobial resistance in Methods: Samples were taken from the external ear canal of 20 dogs with otitis externa from October 2023 to August 2024 at dermatological consultations in the city of Talca. The samples were transported to be processed and analyzed in the MICROVET Veterinary Microbiology laboratory, of the Faculty of Veterinary and Livestock Sciences of the University of Chile, using VITEK® 2 equipment for the identification and determination of antimicrobial susceptibility. The association between the epidemiological variables of the patients and the antimicrobial susceptibility of Results: Staphylococcus spp. isolation was obtained in 8 samples, 62.5% of which were strains of the coagulase-positive Staphylococcus group, of which 25% were identified as Staphylococcus aureus and 37.5% as Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. The remaining 37.5% were coagulase-negative Staphylococcus strains, which were identified as Staphylococcus chromogenes (12.5%), Staphylococcus simulans (12.5%), and Staphylococcus lentus (12.5%). 50 % of the isolates were resistant, with Staphylococcus pseudintermedius being MDR, with resistance to 6 antibiotics, andS. lentus resistant to 5, both of which were also MRS. There was no association between the epidemiological variables of the patients and the antimicrobial susceptibility of the Staphylococcus strains. Conclusion: These preliminary results are the first report in Chile demonstrating the presence of methicillin-resistant
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.