Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40989624›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal2025

Veterinarians' perspectives on pet abuse, legal involvement, and forensic investigation in Thailand: A cross-sectional study.

Athip Lorsirigool, Yuttana Sudjaroen, Narong Kulnides, Natapol Pumipuntu, Arunroj Kullaya, Nontachai Santichat, Kanokwan Tawinwang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Athip LorsirigoolDepartment of Forensic Science, Graduate School, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Yuttana SudjaroenFaculty of Science and Technology, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Narong KulnidesDepartment of Forensic Science, Graduate School, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Natapol PumipuntuOne Health Research Unit, Mahasarakham University, Kham Riang, Thailand.
Arunroj KullayaFaculty of Veterinary Science, Maha Sarakham University, Kham Riang, Thailand.
Nontachai SantichatUdon Thani Animal Quarantine Station, Department of Livestock Development, Mueang, Thailand.
Kanokwan TawinwangTepin Pet Clinic, Nong Bua Lamphu, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Animal abuse is a significant global issue affecting pets, livestock, and wildlife. In Thailand, the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals and the Welfare of Animals Act B.E. 2557 (2014) provides a legal framework for animal protection. However, effective law enforcement and forensic investigations are essential for prosecuting offenders. Veterinarians play a crucial role in identifying and reporting abuse, yet their awareness, legal knowledge, and forensic expertise remain unclear. Aim: This study explores veterinarians' perspectives on pet abuse, legal involvement, and forensic investigations in Thailand. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted from August to December 2024 using an online questionnaire distributed via social media. A total of 153 veterinarians participated, providing demographic data and responses on three key areas: awareness of animal cruelty and welfare (PAWC), knowledge of relevant laws (PLAT), and understanding of forensic science applications forensic methods used to investigate pet animal cruelty (FMIC). Descriptive statistics and inferential analyses were used to examine associations between demographic factors and awareness levels. Results: Veterinarians exhibited high awareness in all three areas (mean scores: PAWC = 4.13, PLAT = 3.59, FMIC = 3.44). Statistical analysis revealed significant associations between gender, age, education level, years since graduation, and workplace awareness levels. Female veterinarians and those working in government agencies demonstrated higher forensic knowledge. Veterinarians aged 35-39 years and those with doctoral degrees exhibited the highest understanding of animal welfare issues. Conclusion: Gender, age, education level, years since graduation, and workplace were found to influence veterinarians' awareness levels and perspectives. The findings highlight the need for continued education and standardized training to enhance veterinarians' roles in preventing and investigating pet abuse cases. Strengthening forensic veterinary practices can contribute to improved animal welfare and legal enforcement in Thailand.

Indexed as

Animal WelfarePetsVeterinariansAdultAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesThailandAbuseForensicLawPetsVeterinary

Identifiers

PMID40989624
PMCPMC12451188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.