ReviewOpen veterinary journal2025
Antiulcer activity of
Review in Open veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Peptic ulcer is a condition where the lining of the stomach is damaged by acid and/or pepsin, often caused by the use of NSAIDs. Previous research has shown that NSAIDs can suppress prostaglandin-E2 synthesis, causing ulceration and delay ulcer healing process. Aim: The researcher had investigated the antiulcer activity of Method: In the study, 36 male albino Wistar rats were used and this study was conducted to assess the safety of the extract. No signs of toxicity were observed in rats given doses up to 5 g/kg body weight, indicating the extract's safety. To induce ulcers, indomethacin (50 mg/kg p.o.) was administered to the rats. The rats were divided into six groups ( Results: The study found that the extract effectively protected against indomethacin-induced gastric mucosal injuries. It showed a significant ( Conclusion:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.