Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40989599›Full record

ReviewOpen veterinary journal2025

Chitosan nanoparticles loaded with

Jasim M Fayyad, Majid J Al-Saadi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Open veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jasim M FayyadDepartment of Veterinary Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.
Majid J Al-SaadiDepartment of Veterinary Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Meat quality and safety are essential issues in the food industry because oxidation and microbial growth directly affect their shelf life and physical and chemical properties. Chitosan and Aim: This study aimed to assess the effects of chitosan nanoparticles (CNPs) and Methods: Mutton samples were treated in four groups (control, CNPs loaded with Results: CNPs loaded with Conclusion: These findings highlight the potential of 2% CNPs loaded with

Indexed as

AloeChitosanFood PreservationFood PreservativesMeatNanoparticlesAnimalsAntioxidantsFood StoragePlant PreparationsAloe vera gelAntioxidantsChitosanFood PreservativesPlant PreparationsAloe veraChitosan nanoparticlesMutton meatPseudomonas aeruginosaRefrigerator storage.

Identifiers

PMID40989599
PMCPMC12451157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.