ReviewFrontiers in aging neuroscience2025
Cognitive deterioration in patients undergoing hemodialysis: how variations in age influence the development of new mechanisms and treatment approaches?
Review in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Cognitive Impairment in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease Undergoing Maintenance Haemodialysis.Actas espanolas de psiquiatria · 2026Article
- Neuro-Renal Crosstalk Across the Chronic Kidney Disease Spectrum: Stage-Dependent Molecular Mechanisms of Cognitive Impairment-An Integrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Structural Connectivity Disruption and Structural-Functional Decoupling in Working Memory Networks Across Pre-Dialysis and Maintenance Hemodialysis End-Stage Renal Disease Patients.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mechanisms of age-related differences and innovative intervention strategies for cognitive dysfunction in hemodialysis patients are crucial for enhancing patient outcomes. This research thoroughly examined the varying pathological aspects of cognitive decline across different age groups. Children and adolescents experience heightened permeability of the blood-brain barrier during critical developmental phases, along with the disruptive effects of uremic toxins on neurotransmitters and synaptic plasticity, which result in diminished white matter integrity and abnormal functioning of the default mode network. Additionally, genomic variations, such as harmful CNVs, coexist with the central nervous system's high plasticity and susceptibility. In contrast, elderly patients face cognitive impairment due to the combined effects of vascular diseases (like small vessel disease and impaired cerebral blood flow regulation) and Alzheimer's-like pathology, exacerbated by dialysis-related hypotension, oxidative stress, and inflammation, which further contribute to reduced cerebral blood flow and neurodegeneration. Consequently, a life cycle-based layered intervention strategy is suggested: children should focus on safeguarding their neural development through collaborative gene-environment interventions and neural stem cell transplants, while elderly patients require standardized treatment for vascular diseases and comorbidities, including Alzheimer's disease. Evidence indicates that incremental dialysis, low temperature dialysis, and high-dose hemodiafiltration can significantly reduce inflammation and oxidative stress markers, slow cognitive decline across all ages, and offer new insights for targeted nephrology management due to their universal effects. Future multi-center cohort studies are necessary to confirm the long-term advantages of age-specific interventions and to support the development of personalized precision treatment systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.