ArticleEcology and evolution2025
Fossorial Form of Water Voles Select and Overexploit High-Quality Habitats, Hindering Future Colonizations Evidence From Drone-Based Monitoring of Dandelion-Vole Interactions in Mountain Meadows.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large-scale remote sensing model enables an integrated monitoring approach for high-resolution tracking pest vole populations.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Fossorial Form of Water Voles Select and Overexploit High-Quality Habitats, Hindering Future Colonizations Evidence From Drone-Based Monitoring of Dandelion-Vole Interactions in Mountain Meadows.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Like many rodents, the water vole is able to reach high densities in meadows. During outbreaks, voles cause significant changes in plant communities. Although water voles consume a wide variety of plant species, dandelions have a unique position: they are selected by voles year-round and serve as a key resource during winter. Voles harvest all parts of the dandelion and store the roots in almost monospecific food stores. As dandelions are perennial plants that take years to grow, vole activity can significantly affect dandelion populations. Our aim was to estimate the influence of dandelion density on vole space use, particularly habitat selection during natal dispersal. We tested the hypothesis that voles select dandelion-rich plots for settlements. We also measured the variation in dandelion density due to new colonies' settlements to assess potential feedback effects. We hypothesized that voles decrease dandelion populations. To achieve that, we used a drone to monitor dandelions and voles over 2 years. We monitored 52 quadrats, each half a hectare, three times a year. We analyzed each image using remote sensing to locate voles and dandelions, and then examined the interactions between their locations over time. We found that dandelion-rich plots were more likely to colonize. In plots with low dandelion density, areas denser than the plot average were also more likely to be colonized. We observed a decrease in the number of dandelions after colony settlement. Finally, we found evidence that existing burrows were more likely to be reused by new voles if dandelions were still present. This study demonstrates that dandelion density is a strong criterion in habitat selection for water voles and that vole colonies rapidly deplete this resource after establishment. These findings provide insight into plant-herbivore interactions and offer valuable perspectives for further exploration of the plant hypothesis, particularly with respect to the dynamics of resource availability and its role in cyclic population fluctuations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.