ArticleEcology and evolution2025
Geography of Life Histories in a Tropical Fauna: The Case of Indian Butterflies.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Geography of Life Histories in a Tropical Fauna: The Case of Indian Butterflies.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The butterfly fauna of the megadiverse Republic of India contains 1386 species. The species richness in its 36 federal states and union territories primarily reflects the peculiar geography of the Indian peninsula, which remains unexplored except for patterns influencing species richness. Here, we develop on previous findings by focusing on species identities, by exploring the impact of physical geography, climate, land covers, socioeconomic conditions of the states, patterns by life history traits and shared evolutionary history of butterflies on the presence of individual species per federal state across the Indian peninsula. Physical geography was the strongest predictor of the states' butterfly fauna compositions, followed by climate, land covers and socioeconomics. The main faunal structures separate the humid Northeast from the rest of the country; distinguish humid Western Ghats states from the rest; and group together peninsular mountains. Analysing life histories showed that butterflies of the humid northeastern and southwestern states tend to be larger and develop on woody plants or large grasses; those of arid and high-altitude states tend to be smaller and develop on small forbs; whereas those utilising broad larval host plant scopes tend to be associated with shrubs and vines and inhabit large geographic ranges. More information on Indian butterflies' life histories would likely yield more intricate insights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.