Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40989497›Full record

ArticleCase reports in veterinary medicine2025

Management of Long Bone Fractures in Two Dogs Using 4.5mm Dynamic Compression Plates.

Jessica Hynes, Helena Rylander, Peter Muir

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in veterinary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jessica HynesComparative Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Department of Surgical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8754-866X
Helena RylanderDepartment of Medical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5350-6222
Peter MuirComparative Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Department of Surgical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0028-6005

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to describe clinical outcomes associated with the use of the 4.5mm dynamic compression plate (DCP) for repair of long bone fractures in two giant breed dogs. Case 1, a 6-year-old male Great Dane, underwent surgical stabilization of a comminuted antebrachial fracture with a 4.5mm broad DCP fixation of the radius in addition to a 3.5mm seven-hole locking compression plate (LCP) that was placed on the ulna. The patient developed a recurrent surgical site infection that was considered a major complication. Follow-up 2 years later demonstrated clinical union of the fracture radiographically, with a Grade 1 of 5 lameness of the thoracic limb and limited range of motion in the carpus. Case 2, a 1-year-old male Saint Bernard, underwent surgical stabilization of a short oblique humeral fracture with a 4.5mm broad DCP fixation. The patient experienced a delayed union and required revision surgery for bone graft placement 3 months after surgery. Clinical union occurred 8 months postoperatively. The use of 4.5mm DCP for long bone fracture repair in two giant breed dogs was associated with successful fracture healing and an acceptable outcome without implant breakage in the face of delayed bone healing that was associated with major complications and continued lameness.

Indexed as

4.5mm bone platedogfracturehumerusradius and ulna

Identifiers

PMID40989497
PMCPMC12453919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.