ReviewPeerJ. Computer science2025
A review of deep learning methods in aquatic animal husbandry.
Review in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Image-Based Analysis of Morphometric Differences Between Sea-Caught and Farmed Large Yellow Croaker (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aquatic animal husbandry is crucial for global food security and supports millions of livelihoods around the world. With the growing demand for seafood, this industry has become economically significant for many regions, contributing to local and global economies. However, as the industry grows, it faces various major challenges that are not encountered in small-scale setups. Traditional methods for classifying, detecting, and monitoring aquatic animals are often time-consuming, labor-intensive, and prone to inaccuracies. The labor-intensive nature of these operations has led many aquaculture operators to move towards automation systems. Yet, for an automation system to be effectively deployed, it needs an intelligent decision-making system, which is where deep learning techniques come into play. In this article, an extensive methodological review of machine learning methods, primarily the deep learning methods used in aquatic animal husbandry are concisely summarized. This article focuses on the use of deep learning in three key areas: classification, localization, and segmentation. Generally, classification techniques are vital in distinguishing between different species of aquatic organisms, while localization methods are used to identify the respective animal's position within a video or an image. Segmentation techniques, on the other hand, enable the precise delineation of organism boundaries, which is essential information in accurate monitoring systems. Among these key areas, segmentation techniques, particularly through the U-Net model, have shown the best results, even achieving a high segmentation performance of 94.44%. This article also highlights the potential of deep learning to enhance the precision, productivity, and sustainability of automated operations in aquatic animal husbandry. Looking ahead, deep learning offers huge potential to transform the aquaculture industry in terms of cost and operations. Future research should focus on refining existing models to better address real-world challenges such as sensor input quality and multi-modal data across various environments for better automation in the aquaculture industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.