Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40989481›Full record

ReviewPeerJ. Computer science2025

A review of deep learning methods in aquatic animal husbandry.

Marzuraikah Mohd Stofa, Fatimah Az Zahra Azizan, Mohd Asyraf Zulkifley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marzuraikah Mohd StofaDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
Fatimah Az Zahra AzizanDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
Mohd Asyraf ZulkifleyDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aquatic animal husbandry is crucial for global food security and supports millions of livelihoods around the world. With the growing demand for seafood, this industry has become economically significant for many regions, contributing to local and global economies. However, as the industry grows, it faces various major challenges that are not encountered in small-scale setups. Traditional methods for classifying, detecting, and monitoring aquatic animals are often time-consuming, labor-intensive, and prone to inaccuracies. The labor-intensive nature of these operations has led many aquaculture operators to move towards automation systems. Yet, for an automation system to be effectively deployed, it needs an intelligent decision-making system, which is where deep learning techniques come into play. In this article, an extensive methodological review of machine learning methods, primarily the deep learning methods used in aquatic animal husbandry are concisely summarized. This article focuses on the use of deep learning in three key areas: classification, localization, and segmentation. Generally, classification techniques are vital in distinguishing between different species of aquatic organisms, while localization methods are used to identify the respective animal's position within a video or an image. Segmentation techniques, on the other hand, enable the precise delineation of organism boundaries, which is essential information in accurate monitoring systems. Among these key areas, segmentation techniques, particularly through the U-Net model, have shown the best results, even achieving a high segmentation performance of 94.44%. This article also highlights the potential of deep learning to enhance the precision, productivity, and sustainability of automated operations in aquatic animal husbandry. Looking ahead, deep learning offers huge potential to transform the aquaculture industry in terms of cost and operations. Future research should focus on refining existing models to better address real-world challenges such as sensor input quality and multi-modal data across various environments for better automation in the aquaculture industry.

Indexed as

Aquatic animal monitoringArtificial intelligenceAutomation systemDeep learningMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40989481
PMCPMC12453753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.