Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40989480›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

Predicting academic performance for students' university: case study from Saint Cloud State University.

Bilal I Al-Ahmad, Abdullah Alzaqebah, Rami Alkhawaldeh, Ala' M Al-Zoubi, Hsuehi Lo, Adel Ali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bilal I Al-AhmadDepartment of Computer Information Systems, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, The University of Jordan, Aqaba, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0002-1267-1026
Abdullah AlzaqebahThe World Islamic Sciences and Education University, Amman, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0002-9046-8840
Rami AlkhawaldehDepartment of Computer Information Systems, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, The University of Jordan, Aqaba, Jordan.
Ala' M Al-ZoubiDepartment of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Science and Information Technology, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Hsuehi LoCollege of Education and Learning Design, St. Cloud State University, Minnesota, United States.
Adel AliDepartment of Computing, Informatics, and Data Science, St. Cloud State University, Minnesota, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting students' performance is one of the essential educational data mining approaches aimed at observing learning outcomes. Predicting grade point average (GPA) helps to monitor academic performance and assists advisors in identifying students at risk of failure, major changes, or dropout. To enhance prediction performance, this study employs a long short-term memory (LSTM) model using a rich set of academic and demographic features. The dataset, drawn from 29,455 students at Saint Cloud State University (SCSU) over eight years (2016-2024), was carefully preprocessed by eliminating irrelevant and missing data, encoding categorical variables, and normalizing numerical features. Feature importance was determined using a permutation-based method to identify the most impactful variables on term GPA prediction. Furthermore, model hyperparameters, including the number of LSTM layers, units per layer, batch size, learning rate, and activation functions, were fine-tuned using experimental validation with the Adam optimizer and learning rate scheduling. Two experiments were conducted at both the college and department levels. The proposed model outperformed traditional machine learning models such as linear regression (LR), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and support vector regressor (SVR), and it surpasses two deep learning models, recurrent neural network (RNN) and convolutional neural network (CNN), achieving 9.54 mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), 0.0059 mean absolute error (MAE), 0.0001 root mean square error (RMSE), and an R² score of 99%.

Indexed as

LSTMPredictionSCSUTerm GPA

Identifiers

PMID40989480
PMCPMC12453804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.