ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
Predicting academic performance for students' university: case study from Saint Cloud State University.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting students' performance is one of the essential educational data mining approaches aimed at observing learning outcomes. Predicting grade point average (GPA) helps to monitor academic performance and assists advisors in identifying students at risk of failure, major changes, or dropout. To enhance prediction performance, this study employs a long short-term memory (LSTM) model using a rich set of academic and demographic features. The dataset, drawn from 29,455 students at Saint Cloud State University (SCSU) over eight years (2016-2024), was carefully preprocessed by eliminating irrelevant and missing data, encoding categorical variables, and normalizing numerical features. Feature importance was determined using a permutation-based method to identify the most impactful variables on term GPA prediction. Furthermore, model hyperparameters, including the number of LSTM layers, units per layer, batch size, learning rate, and activation functions, were fine-tuned using experimental validation with the Adam optimizer and learning rate scheduling. Two experiments were conducted at both the college and department levels. The proposed model outperformed traditional machine learning models such as linear regression (LR), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and support vector regressor (SVR), and it surpasses two deep learning models, recurrent neural network (RNN) and convolutional neural network (CNN), achieving 9.54 mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), 0.0059 mean absolute error (MAE), 0.0001 root mean square error (RMSE), and an R² score of 99%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.