ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
Majority clustering for imbalanced image classification.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Class imbalance is a prevalent challenge in image classification tasks, where certain classes are significantly underrepresented compared to others. This imbalance often leads to biased models that perform poorly in predicting minority classes, affecting the overall performance and reliability of image classification systems. In this article, an under-sampling approach based on reducing the samples of majority class is used along with the unsupervised clustering approach for partitioning the majority class into clusters within the datasets. The proposed technique, Majority Clustering for Imbalanced Image Classification (MCIIC) improves the traditional binary classification problems by converting it into multi-class problem, thereby creating the more balanced classification solution to the problems where one need to detect rare samples present in the dataset. By utilizing the elbow method, we determine the optimal number of clusters for the majority class and assign each cluster a new class label. This complete process ensures a balanced and symmetrical class distribution, effectively addressing imbalances both between and within classes and helps to perform imbalanced classification. The effectiveness of the proposed model is evaluated on various benchmark datasets, demonstrating their ability to improve the predictive performance of the proposed MCIIC on imbalanced image datasets. Through empirical evaluation, we showcase the impact of proposed technique on model accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score, highlighting its importance as a pre-processing step in handling imbalanced image datasets. The results highlight the significance of proposed model as a practical approach to address the challenges posed by imbalanced data distributions in machine learning tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.