Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40989464›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

DDSUD: dynamically detecting subsequence uncertainty and diversity for active learning in imbalanced Chinese sentiment analysis.

Shufeng Xiong, Yibo Si, Guipei Zhang, Bingkun Wang, Guang Zheng, Haiping Si

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shufeng XiongCollege of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yibo SiCollege of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Guipei ZhangCollege of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Bingkun WangSchool of Information Engineering, Zhengzhou College of Finance and Economics, Zhengzhou, China.
Guang ZhengCollege of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Haiping SiCollege of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sentiment structure analysis in Chinese text typically relies on supervised deep-learning methods for sequence labeling. However, obtaining large-scale labeled datasets is both resource-intensive and time-consuming. To address these challenges, this study proposes Dynamically Detecting Subsequence Uncertainty and Diversity (DDSUD), a Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT)-based active learning framework designed to tackle subsequence uncertainty and enhance the diversity of imbalanced datasets. DDSUD combines subsequence uncertainty detection, diversity-driven sample selection, and dynamic weighting, enabling an adaptive balance between these factors throughout the active learning iterations. Experimental results show that DDSUD achieves performance close to fully supervised training schemes with only 50% of the data labeled, and outperforms other state-of-the-art active learning methods with the same amount of labeled data. Moreover, by dynamically adjusting the trade-off between subsequence uncertainty and diversity, DDSUD demonstrates strong adaptability and generalization capability in low-resource environments, especially in handling imbalanced datasets, significantly improving the recognition of minority class samples.

Indexed as

Acitve learningBERTDeep learningSentiment analysis

Identifiers

PMID40989464
PMCPMC12453870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.