ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
Automated lung cancer diagnosis from chest X-ray images using convolutional neural networks.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. While computed tomography (CT) scans provide more comprehensive medical information than chest X-rays (CXR), the high cost and limited availability of CT technology in rural areas pose significant challenges. CXR images, however, could serve as a potential preliminary diagnostic tool in diagnosing lung cancer, especially when combined with a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system. This study aims to enhance the accuracy and accessibility of lung cancer detection using a custom-designed convolutional neural network (CNN) trained on CXR images. Methods: A custom-designed CNN was trained on an openly accessible CXR dataset from the Japanese Society for Radiological Technology (JSRT). Prior to training, the dataset underwent preprocessing, where each image was divided into overlapping patches. A t-test was applied to these patches to distinguish relevant from irrelevant ones. The relevant patches were retained for training the CNN model, while the irrelevant patches were excluded to enhance the model's performance. Results: The proposed model yielded a mean accuracy of 83.2 ± 2.91%, demonstrating its potential as a cost-effective and accessible preliminary diagnostic tool for lung cancer. Conclusions: This approach could significantly improve the accuracy and accessibility of lung cancer detection, making it a viable option in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.