ReviewPeerJ. Computer science2025
Multi-objective optimization for smart cities: a systematic review of algorithms, challenges, and future directions.
Review in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI-Driven Energy-Efficient Routing in IoT-Based Wireless Sensor Networks: A Comprehensive Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the growing complexity and interdependence of urban systems, multi-objective optimization (MOO) has become a critical tool for smart-city planning, sustainability, and real-time decision-making. This article presents a systematic literature review (SLR) of 117 peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and 2025, assessing the evolution, classification, and performance of MOO techniques in smart-city contexts. Existing algorithms are organised into four families-bio-inspired, mathematical theory-driven, physics-inspired, and machine-learning-enhanced-and benchmarked for computational efficiency, scalability, and scenario suitability across six urban domains: infrastructure, energy, transportation, Internet of Things (IoT)/cloud systems, agriculture, and water management. While established methods such as Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) and Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm based on Decomposition (MOED/D) remain prevalent, hybrid frameworks that couple deep learning with evolutionary search display superior adaptability in high-dimensional, dynamic environments. Persistent challenges include limited cross-domain generalisability, inadequate uncertainty handling, and low interpretability of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted models. Twelve research gaps are synthesised-from privacy-preserving optimisation and sustainable trade-off resolution to integration with digital twins, large language models, and neuromorphic computing-and a roadmap towards scalable, interpretable, and resilient optimisation frameworks is outlined. Finally, a ready-to-use benchmarking toolkit and a deployment-oriented algorithm-selection matrix are provided to guide researchers, engineers, and policy-makers in real-world smart-city applications. This review targets interdisciplinary researchers, optimisation developers, and smart-city practitioners seeking to apply or advance MOO techniques in complex urban systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.