Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40989432›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

A hybrid deep learning approach with progressive cyclical CNN and firebug swarm optimization for breast cancer detection.

Sudha Prathyusha Jakkaladiki, Filip Malý

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sudha Prathyusha JakkaladikiDepartment of Informatics and Quant. Methods, University of Education Hradec Kralove, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Filip MalýDepartment of Informatics and Quant. Methods, University of Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The practice of diagnosing breast cancer retains its scope for improvement in medical imaging, where every correct and timely diagnosis enhances the survival rate of patients. This article presents an integrated approach utilizing patch-wise breast image segmentation, hybrid deep feature extraction, followed by progressive cyclical convolutional neural networks (P-CycCNN), and firebug swarm optimization (FSO) to enhance breast cancer detection. This method first incorporates image segmentation by patches to break down the mammography images into smaller patches, which are easier to focus on and allow for the extraction of more features to boost detection rates. Hybrid feature extraction combines convolutional neural network (CNN) features extracted from pre-trained models with handcrafted features that describe texture and shape, thereby enabling the model to grasp the nuances of both coarse and fine images comprehensively. The progressive cyclical CNN strategy incorporates cyclical, re-adjusted learning rates and a progressive training schedule to accelerate and enhance the model's convergence. FSO is introduced to adjust the hyperparameters of the CNN topology, including the learning rate and regularisation parameters, thereby enhancing training and feature-fusion processes. Evaluated on the Curated Breast Imaging Subset of the Digital Database for Screening Mammography (CBIS-DDSM) dataset, the proposed model achieved 98% test accuracy, 95% precision, 97.2% recall, 96% F1-score, and an AUC of 0.95, outperforming baseline CNN models by 4%-6% across key metrics. This approach holds great potential for enhancing detection systems in clinics, allowing earlier and more accurate detection of malignant lesions.

Indexed as

Breast cancer detectionDeep learningFirebug swarm optimizationHybrid feature extractionMammographyProgressive cyclical CNN

Identifiers

PMID40989432
PMCPMC12453785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.