ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
A novel deep learning approach for predicting stone-free rates post-ESWL on uncontrasted CT.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is one of the most often employed therapy methods for managing kidney stones. In our work, we sought to assess the efficacy of the artificial intelligence model developed using non-contrast computed tomography (CT) images in predicting stone-free rates for ESWL. The main difference between this study and other studies is that it proposes an artificial intelligence-based model that predicts the success of ESWL treatment using artificial intelligence methods. Data from 910 patients who underwent ESWL between January 2016 and June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Since the local binary pattern (LBP) and histogram of oriented gradients (HOG) feature extraction methods gave more successful results than other methods, a new feature map was obtained using the neighborhood component analysis (NCA) dimension reduction method after combining the features obtained using these methods. Then, the reduced feature map was classified into classifiers. In conclusion, we analyzed the effect of ESWL treatment using different artificial intelligence methods and found that the prediction accuracy was 94% on average. Results were obtained from seven different convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and two textural-based models in the study. Since textural-based models achieved the highest success among these models, these models were used as the base in the proposed model. The proposed model achieved better results than nine different models used in the study. When the results obtained from the proposed hybrid model for ESWL prediction are examined, this model will guide experts in the treatment of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.