ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
Comparison of EfficientNet CNN models for multi-label chest X-ray disease diagnosis.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- StrokeCT-2C5K: A Two-Center Cranial CT Dataset for Four-Class Stroke Classification Using SE-Attention-Enhanced Deep Learning Models.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- CR-MSNet: a dual-branch multi-scale attention network for multi-label chest X-ray classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Scalable Unimodal and Multimodal Deep Learning for Multi-Label Chest Disease Detection: A Comparative Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Clinical validation of lightweight CNN architectures for reliable multi-class classification of lung cancer using histopathological imaging techniques.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The analysis of chest X-ray images, which are critical for the early diagnosis of many diseases, is a difficult and time-consuming process due to the multiple labeling requirements and similar looking pathologies. In traditional methods, expert physicians analyze high-resolution chest X-ray images to diagnose these diseases using observational methods, a process that can lead to human error and hence misdiagnosis or underdiagnosis. In this study, we aim to autonomously detect 14 different diseases that significantly affect human health and some cases even lead to death using chest X-ray images in a multi-class manner using deep learning techniques. Previous studies on chest X-ray images focus on a single disease or have low success rates, and the architectures presented in previous studies have high computational costs. The novelty of this work is that it presents a hybrid lightweight, fast and attention-based architecture with high classification performance. In this study, we used the ChestX-Ray14 dataset consisting of 112,104 labeled chest X-ray images of 14 disease classes. Eight deep learning architectures (EfficientNetB0-B7) and coordinate attention mechanism are used in the training and testing processes. The proposed EfficientNetB7 architecture achieved an average overall classification performance with an AUC value of 0.8265. The EfficientNet enhanced with coordinate attention architecture achieved a classification success with an AUC value of 0.8309. Moreover, when the proposed architecture and the individual disease classes are considered separately, higher classification success is achieved for eight of the 14 diseases in the dataset. Finally, the results of this study outperformed the classification performance of other similar studies in the literature in terms of AUC score. The results obtained in our study show that the proposed deep learning based lightweight and fast architecture can support radiologists in decision making in disease diagnosis. The use of autonomous disease diagnosis systems can support the protection of human health by preventing incomplete or erroneous diagnoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.