Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40989411›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

Innovative multi objective optimization based automatic fake news detection.

Cebrail Barut, Suna Yildirim, Bilal Alatas, Gungor Yildirim

Abstract readNews
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cebrail BarutDepartment of Continuing Education Center, Firat (Euphrates) University, Elazig, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-2756-5434
Suna YildirimData Processing Department, Secretary General of Special Provincial Administration, Data Processing Department, Secretary General of Special Provincial Administration, Elazig, Turkey.
Bilal AlatasSoftware Engineering, Firat (Euphrates) University, Elazig, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-3513-0329
Gungor YildirimComputer Engineering, Firat (Euphrates) University, Elazig, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4096-4838

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the digital revolution, access to information is expanding day by day and individuals can access information quickly through the internet and social media platforms. However, in most cases, there is no mechanism in place to evaluate the accuracy of news that spreads rapidly on social media. This increases the potential for fake news to mislead both individuals and society. In order to minimize the negative effects of fake news, it has become a critical necessity to detect them quickly and effectively. Metaheuristic methods can provide more effective solutions in fake news detection compared to traditional methods. Especially in small datasets, metaheuristics are known to produce faster and more effective solutions than artificial intelligence and machine learning based methods. In the literature, the majority of fake news detection studies have focused on the optimization of a single criterion. In this study, unlike other studies, a method that enables simultaneous optimization of two criteria (precision and recall) in fake news detection is developed. In the proposed approach, an innovative solution is presented by using the Crowding Distance Level method instead of the Crowding Distance method used in the standard Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm 2 (NSGA-2) algorithm. The proposed method is tested on four different datasets such as Covid-19, Syrian war daily news and FakeNewsNet (Gossipcop). The results show that the proposed method achieves high success especially on small datasets.

Indexed as

Fake news detectionMetaheuristic algorithmsMulti objective optimization

Identifiers

PMID40989411
PMCPMC12453838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.