Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40989395›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

Evaluation of predictive maintenance efficiency with the comparison of machine learning models in machining production process in brake industry.

Can Aydın, Burak Evrentuğ

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Can AydınDepartment of Management Information System, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, İzmir Province, Turkey.
Burak EvrentuğDepartment of Computer Programming, Izmir University of Economics, İzmir, İzmir Province, Turkey.ORCID 0009-0004-7814-7077

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The utilization of technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in industrial sectors has become a crucial requirement to enhance the efficiency and stability of production processes. Regular maintenance of machines and early detection of faults play a critical role in ensuring uninterrupted production and business continuity. Predictive maintenance practices, combined with sensors and data analysis methods, enable the collection, analysis, and transformation of machine-related data into meaningful insights. As a result, the anticipation of potential machine failures, the execution of planned maintenance activities, and the prevention of unexpected downtime become possible. These methods not only improve productivity in production processes but also contribute to reducing maintenance costs. Methods: This study aims to predict machine faults using data analysis methods and enhance the accuracy performance of these predictions for an industrial company that produces braking components. Comprehensive examination and analysis of data were conducted to understand the symptoms and relationships of machine failures. ML classification methods were employed in the relevant study. Results: Challenges such as the imbalance of class distributions in the dataset, the presence of missing and outlier values, and the high costs of necessary equipment and training pose significant barriers to implementation. Addressing these issues is critical for achieving effective predictive maintenance solutions. In order to achieve more accurate results, data splitting and k-fold cross-validation methods were applied during the learning and testing phases to overcome the imbalance problem in the dataset, undersampling techniques were applied, and outlier detection and normalization processes were used to improve data quality. The model performances, evaluated through accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score, area under the curve (AUC), Cohen's Matthew's correlation coefficient (MCC) were compared. Hyperparameter optimization was also performed, resulting in significant improvements in model performance. This study contributes to the literature in terms of predictive maintenance application, classification, and data partitioning techniques. The findings highlight the importance of data preprocessing and advanced modeling techniques in predictive maintenance and emphasize how addressing data challenges can enhance the overall performance and reliability of ML models.

Indexed as

Fault diagnosisMachine learningPredictive maintenance

Identifiers

PMID40989395
PMCPMC12453749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.