Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40989385›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

A GAN-based approach to solar radiation prediction: data augmentation and model optimization for Saudi Arabia.

Abdalla Alameen, Sultan Mesfer Aldossary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abdalla AlameenDepartment of Computer Engineering and Information, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Wadi ad-Dawasir, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sultan Mesfer AldossaryDepartment of Computer Engineering and Information, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Wadi ad-Dawasir, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-3233-6487

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate solar radiation prediction is essential for optimizing renewable energy systems but remains challenging due to data scarcity and variability. This study addresses these challenges by employing generative adversarial networks (GANs) to generate high-quality synthetic solar radiation data. Methods: A novel framework was developed that integrates GAN-generated synthetic data with machine learning and deep learning models, including CNN-LSTM architectures. These models were trained and evaluated using augmented datasets to improve predictive accuracy and adaptability across diverse climatic zones. Results: Models trained on augmented datasets exhibited significant improvements, with root mean square error (RMSE) reduced by 15.2% and mean absolute error (MAE) decreased by 19.9%. The framework effectively bridged data gaps and enhanced model generalization, enabling applicability across various climatic regions in Saudi Arabia. Conclusions: The proposed framework facilitates practical applications such as photovoltaic system optimization, grid stability enhancement, and resource planning. By aligning with Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030 and global renewable energy objectives, this study presents a scalable and adaptable approach to advancing renewable energy systems. However, challenges such as computational complexity and hyperparameter sensitivity warrant further investigation, providing a robust pathway toward sustainable energy futures worldwide.

Indexed as

Climate adaptabilityCNN-LSTM modelsData augmentationData scarcityDeep learningGenerative adversarial networks (GANs)Machine learningRenewable energy optimizationSolar radiation prediction

Identifiers

PMID40989385
PMCPMC12453800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.