ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
Anomaly detection method for power system information based on multimodal data.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the increasing complexity of modern power systems, effective anomaly detection is essential to ensure operational security. Conventional methods often depend on single-domain data, which limits their ability to fully capture the dynamic behavior of power systems. This study introduces a novel multimodal approach that integrates time-domain and frequency-domain data to improve anomaly detection accuracy and robustness. By leveraging this integration, our method captures both temporal patterns and spectral signatures, offering a more comprehensive analysis of system behavior-an advancement that significantly enhances detection performance compared to traditional techniques. Experimental results show that our approach achieves a detection accuracy of 97.6%, outperforming baseline methods. Beyond its technical merits, this method has practical implications for real-world power systems, enabling early identification of security threats, improving system reliability, and reducing the risk of operational failures. These findings contribute to the field of power system security and provide a versatile framework for anomaly detection in critical infrastructures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.