ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
Unveiling the capabilities of vision transformers in sperm morphology analysis: a comparative evaluation.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of vision transformers and vision foundation models for sperm morphology analysis.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional sperm morphology assessment relies on manual visual inspection or semi-automated computer-aided sperm analysis (CASA) systems, which often require labor-intensive pre-processing steps. While recent machine learning approaches, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have improved feature extraction from sperm images, achieving a fully automated and highly accurate system remains challenging due to the complexity of sperm morphology and the need for specialized image adjustments. This study presents a novel, end-to-end automated sperm morphology analysis framework based on vision transformers (ViTs), which processes raw sperm images from two benchmark datasets-Human Sperm Head Morphology (HuSHeM) and Sperm Morphology Image Data Set (SMIDS)-without manual pre-processing. We conducted an extensive hyperparameter optimization study across eight ViT variants, evaluating learning rates, optimization algorithms, and data augmentation scales. Our experiments demonstrated that data augmentation significantly enhances ViT performance by improving generalization, particularly in limited-data scenarios. A comparative analysis of CNNs, hybrid models, and pure ViTs revealed that transformer-based architectures consistently outperform traditional methods. The BEiT_Base model achieved state-of-the-art accuracies of 92.5% (SMIDS) and 93.52% (HuSHeM), surpassing prior CNN-based approaches by 1.63% and 1.42%, respectively. Statistical significance (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.