ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
Web application firewall based on machine learning models.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing reliance on web applications for storing sensitive data and financial transactions has elevated the importance of web application security. A machine learning-based web application firewall was designed to protect web applications against injection vulnerabilities. A hybrid dataset, including CISC 2010, HTTPParams 2015, and real-time Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) requests, was employed. The study evaluated five classification algorithms-K-nearest neighbors, logistic regression, naïve Bayes, support vector machine, and decision tree-for detecting cross site scripting (XSS), Structured Query Language (SQL) Injection, Operating System Command Injection, and Local File Inclusion attacks. Decision tree was identified as the algorithm with the highest precision, accuracy, recall, F1-score, receiver operating characteristic (ROC), and area under the curve (AUC) values. According to the confusion matrix analysis, the real-time tested web application firewalls (WAF) achieved a remarkably high F1 score of 93.13% and accuracy of 93.27%. The findings indicate that machine learning-based WAFs effectively protect web applications against injection threats. Future work includes expanding the WAF to cover other attack types and testing it on different datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.