ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
Mam-Incept-Net: a novel inception model for precise interpretation of mammography images.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transformer-enhanced deep ensemble for multi-class liver disease classification using computed tomography images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Calibrated Transformer Fusion for Dual-View Low-Energy CESM Classification.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- A review of deep learning architectures for plant disease detection.Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early diagnosis of breast cancer through periodic screening is a vital ally in the fight for survival. Mammography, recognized as one of the most widely used and cost-effective tools for detecting early signs of asymmetry, calcification, masses, and architectural distortion in breast tissue, plays a significant role in nearly all screening scenarios. However, the interpretation and scoring of mammograms is a complex multi-parameter process that frequently leads to false-positive and false-negative results. This article introduces a new deep-learning-based model that classifies mammograms according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) assessment categories. The model is trained on a private dataset, intentionally excluding no BI-RADS categories. A novel deep neural network architecture is employed to more accurately classify breasts, including their boundaries, as regions of interest (ROIs). The ConvNeXt architecture serves as a feature extractor for lower-level features, which are then combined with the layers of a randomly initialized naive inception module to capture higher-level features. Diagnosis is achieved through three experimental tests, yielding accuracy rates ranging from 82.08% to 86.27%. These promising accuracy levels, in comparison to previous studies, can be attributed to a more comprehensive approach to addressing BI-RADS scoring challenges. In addition to pursuing further enhancements in accuracy, future research should consider integrating prior radiology reports to create a more realistic end-to-end computer-aided detection system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.