Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40989338›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

CurriMAE: curriculum learning based masked autoencoders for multi-labeled pediatric thoracic disease classification.

Taeyoung Yoon, Daesung Kang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Taeyoung YoonSchool of Bio-Health Convergence, College of Natural Sciences, Sungshin Women's University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0008-9454-8590
Daesung KangSchool of Bio-Health Convergence, College of Natural Sciences, Sungshin Women's University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Masked autoencoders (MAE) have emerged as a powerful framework for self-supervised learning by reconstructing masked input data. However, determining the optimal masking ratio requires extensive experimentation, resulting in significant computational overhead. To address this challenge, we propose CurriMAE, a curriculum-based training approach that progressively increases the masking ratio during pretraining to balance task complexity and computational efficiency. In CurriMAE, the training process spans 800 epochs, with the masking ratio gradually increasing in four stages: 60% for the first 200 epochs, followed by 70%, 80%, and finally 90% in the last 200 epochs. This progressive masking approach, inspired by curriculum learning, allows the model to learn from simpler tasks before tackling more challenging ones. To ensure stable convergence, a cyclic cosine learning rate scheduler is employed, resetting every 200 epochs, effectively dividing the training process into four distinct stages. At the end of each stage, corresponding to one complete cycle of the learning rate schedule, a snapshot model is saved, resulting in four pretrained models. These snapshots are then fine-tuned to obtain the final classification results. We evaluate CurriMAE on multi-labeled pediatric thoracic disease classification, pretraining the model on CheXpert and ChestX-ray14 datasets, and fine-tuning it on PediCXR. Experimental results show that CurriMAE outperforms ResNet, ViT-S, and standard MAE, achieving superior performance while reducing computational cost. These findings establish CurriMAE as an effective and scalable self-supervised learning framework for medical imaging applications.

Indexed as

Curriculum learningMasked autoencodersMulti-labeled problemPediatric CXRSelf-supervised learningSnapshot ensemble

Identifiers

PMID40989338
PMCPMC12453726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.