Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40989326›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

Design of performance evaluation method for higher education reform based on adaptive fuzzy algorithm.

Dakun Yang, Muhammad Sheraz Arshad Malik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dakun YangSchool of Marxism, Anyang Institute of Technology, Anyang, China.
Muhammad Sheraz Arshad MalikDepartment of Software Engineering, Government College University, Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-0944-6362

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a performance evaluation framework for university teachers based on the adaptive neural fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), aiming to enhance teaching quality and institutional management through a scientific, objective, and comprehensive assessment mechanism. The proposed method begins by developing a robust evaluation index system that integrates key dimensions of academic activity, including teaching performance, research contributions, and fundamental faculty information. A total of 16 sub-indicators are incorporated into the evaluation framework. To optimize data processing and reduce redundancy, factor analysis is applied, simplifying the indicator set while maintaining the integrity and effectiveness of the evaluation process. The core of the system leverages the strengths of both fuzzy logic and neural networks, combining the capacity of fuzzy systems to handle imprecise and uncertain information with the adaptive learning capabilities of neural networks. This hybrid approach improves the accuracy, interpretability, and adaptability of the evaluation results. By continuously optimizing the model using training data, the system dynamically refines its rule base and parameters, eliminating the reliance on manually defined parameters common in traditional fuzzy systems. The effectiveness of the ANFIS-based evaluation model is validated through empirical experiments. The results demonstrate that the proposed model outperforms conventional methods, such as backpropagation (BP) neural networks and support vector machines (SVMs), in terms of accuracy, precision, and overall performance. This research offers a novel and practical approach for evaluating university teacher performance, enabling more accurate reflection of teaching and research outcomes, and providing valuable decision-making support for academic management.

Indexed as

Adaptive neuro fuzzy systemFactor analysis methodUniversity evaluation

Identifiers

PMID40989326
PMCPMC12453743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.