Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40989324›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

Grammatical error correction for low-resource languages: a review of challenges, strategies, computational and future directions.

Syauqie Muhammad Marier, Xiangfan Chen, Linan Zhu, Xiangjie Kong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Syauqie Muhammad MarierZhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xiangfan ChenZhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Linan ZhuZhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xiangjie KongZhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2698-3319

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grammatical error correction (GEC) is crucial for enhancing the readability and comprehension of texts, particularly in improving text quality in low-resource languages. However, challenges such as data scarcity, linguistic diversity, and limited computational resources hinder advancements in this domain. To address these challenges, researchers have developed strategies such as synthetic data generation, multilingual pre-trained models, and cross-lingual transfer learning. This review synthesizes findings from key studies to explore effective GEC methods for low-resource languages, emphasizing approaches for handling limited annotated corpora, typological complexities, and evaluation challenges. Synthetic data generation techniques, including noise injection, adversarial error generation, and translationese-based augmentation, have proven vital for overcoming data scarcity. Multilingual and transfer learning approaches demonstrate effectiveness in adapting knowledge from high-resource languages to low-resource settings, especially when combined with fine-tuning on curated datasets. Additionally, linguistic diversity has been partially addressed through methods like morphology-aware embeddings, byte-level tokenization, and contextual data preprocessing. However, limited research exists on robust evaluation metrics tailored to diverse typologies, such as agglutinative and morphologically rich languages, and the creation of gold-standard datasets remains an ongoing challenge. Recent advancements in dataset construction and the use of large language models further enrich this field, offering scalable solutions for low-resource contexts. Despite notable progress, this review identifies gaps in evaluation methodologies and typology-specific solutions, calling for future innovations in multilingual modeling, dataset creation, and computationally efficient GEC systems tailored to the unique needs of low-resource languages.

Indexed as

Data scarcityGenerating data strategyGrammatical error correctionLanguage diversityLow-resource language

Identifiers

PMID40989324
PMCPMC12453789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.