ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
Fairness modeling for topics with different scales in short texts.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The application of topic modeling to short texts is beset by challenges such as data sparsity and an absence of contextual information. Traditional research methods tend to prioritise high-attention and popular topics, frequently overlooking the identification of emerging topics. Consequently, subjects of a minor scale are prone to being overlooked during the topic identification process. Furthermore, in the context of topic modelling, information that varies in terms of the attention it receives is not treated equally. In order to address the aforementioned issues, a fairness-oriented topic discovery approach (MixTM-G) is proposed. This approach has been designed to facilitate the discovery of topics with different levels of attention. The proposed methodology involves the integration of normalized pointwise mutual information (NPMI) within a graph model to analyse text data. This approach leverages the correlation between data points to assess the semantic relationships between words, thus addressing the limitations posed by sparse data. The employment of graph algorithms facilitates the identification of semantically related clusters within the document graph, thereby enhancing the semantic associations between sparse data. Finally, a mixed topic modeling approach (MixTM), based on bi-grams and tri-grams combinations, is proposed to further improve topic discovery by strengthening the contextual relationships between words. The experimental results demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed method in topic modelling. In comparison to conventional methods, the proposed approach exhibits superior performance in detecting small-scale topics under equivalent conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.