ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
Hardware implementation of FPGA-based spiking attention neural network accelerator.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hallucination-aware learning and latency optimization transformer (HALL-OPT) for real-time edge intelligence.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spiking neural networks (SNNs) are recognized as third-generation neural networks and have garnered significant attention due to their biological plausibility and energy efficiency. To address the resource constraints associated with using field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) for numerical recognition in SNNs, we proposed a lightweight spiking efficient attention neural network (SeaSNN) accelerator. We designed a simple, four-layer structured network, achieving a recognition accuracy of 93.73% through software testing on the MNIST dataset. To further enhance the model's accuracy, we developed a highly spiking efficient channel attention mechanism (SECA), resulting in a significant performance improvement and an increase in test accuracy to 94.28%. For higher recognition speed, we optimized circuit parallelism by applying techniques such as loop unrolling, loop pipelining, and array partitioning. Finally, SeaSNN was implemented and verified on an FPGA board, achieving an inference speed of 0.000401 seconds per frame and a power efficiency of 0.42 TOPS/W at a frequency of 200 MHz. These results demonstrate that the proposed low-power, high-precision, and fast handwritten digit recognition system is well-suited for handwritten digit recognition tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.