ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
Opposition-based learning techniques in metaheuristics: classification, comparison, and convergence analysis.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- HTPI: A New Head-Tail Population Initialization for Feature Selection Stability in IoT IDSs with Post Hoc Explainable AI Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Chaotic Regulation of Exploration and Exploitation in Bio-Inspired Swarm Intelligence for Combinatorial Optimization.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Mpox Awareness and Knowledge Among Residents of the Northern Border Region, Saudi Arabia: Implications for Community Preparedness.Journal of community health · 2026Article
- A Chaos-Enhanced Binary Newton-Raphson Optimizer for High-Dimensional Sensor Data Feature Selection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Sliding mode control gain optimization for a robot arm manipulator using an improved stochastic framework.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Research on a multi-strategy enhanced parrot optimization algorithm STPO for Complex optimization problems and its applications.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Clustering Performance Analysis Using Chaotic and Lévy Flight-Enhanced Black-Winged Kite Algorithms.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- LS-BMO-HDBSCAN as a hybrid memetic bacterial intelligence framework for efficient data clustering.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A hybrid PSO-AVOA framework for patient-reported drug prioritization with enhanced exploration and exploitation.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, opposition-based learning (OBL) has emerged as a powerful enhancement strategy in metaheuristic algorithms (MAs), gaining significant attention for its potential to accelerate convergence and improve solution quality. Existing research lacks a structured analysis of how different OBL variants influence optimization performance when integrated into various MAs. This study categorizes and analyzes nine distinct OBL techniques: basic opposition-based learning, quasi-opposition-based learning, generalized opposition-based learning, current optimum opposition-based learning, quasi-reflection opposition-based learning, centroid opposition-based learning, random opposition-based learning, super opposition-based learning, and stochastic opposition-based learning. To systematically assess the effectiveness of these techniques, five widely used OBL variants-basic opposition-based learning, quasi-opposition-based learning, generalized opposition-based learning, current optimum opposition-based learning, quasi-reflection opposition-based learning-were selected for implementation within five well-established MAs: differential evolution, genetic algorithm, particle swarm optimization, artificial bee colony, and harmony search. These hybridized algorithms were evaluated across different integration phases, including the initialization passes and generation updates phase, and in both phases. To experimentally demonstrate the capability of OBL strategies to enhance MAs that face common issues such as slow convergence, limited exploration, and imbalanced exploration-exploitation, we have used 12 benchmark functions from CEC2022 suite. Key performance metrics-including maximum, minimum, mean, standard deviation, and convergence curves-were rigorously analyzed to quantify the improvements introduced by each OBL-enhanced MA. Additionally, a Friedman test was conducted to statistically validate the performance differences among the variants. The results indicate that quasi-reflection opposition-based learning consistently outperforms other OBL variants, demonstrating superior convergence speed and solution quality across most benchmark functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.