ReviewFrontiers in psychology2025
What affects people's use of and attitudes toward gender-inclusive language? A literature review.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review synthesizes research on factors shaping attitudes toward and use of gender-inclusive language across linguistic, cultural, and methodological contexts. Sexist beliefs consistently predict negative attitudes and lower usage. Neither gender nor age per se are reliable predictors. Use of inclusive language has risen over time, driven by shifting norms and increased exposure. Political and social environments play a role, with progressive contexts and early equality legislation linked to greater support. Situational factors-such as conversational setting and perceived audience views-and political orientation influence language choices, with liberal individuals and institutions using inclusive forms more often. People with high and low education levels share similar attitudes, and non-academics may use inclusive language more than academics in certain settings. These results underscore the importance of addressing gender stereotypes and implementing policies and training to promote gender equality in everyday communication. Future pathways for research are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.