ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025
From innovation to integration: a global mixed-methods study of VR, metaverse, and 3D simulation in healthcare training and clinical setting.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The global contributions and emerging trends of extended reality-driven transformation in orthopedic surgical education: a bibliometric study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immersive technologies in healthcare including virtual reality (VR), metaverse platforms, and 3D display technology are transforming global healthcare by improving medical education, advancing surgical training, enhancing patient preparedness, and facilitating remote collaboration. Adoption varies regionally due to infrastructure, cost, and digital literacy gaps. This study examined their impact on healthcare training and delivery outcomes and identified key integration barriers. Methods: This mixed-methods instructional-integration study spanning four regions, Japan, the Middle East and North Africa, China, and the United States, utilized pre- and post-training surveys. Participant confidence in using immersive technologies was rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Paired t-tests determined significance. Thematic analysis of qualitative data (open-ended responses) identified key benefits and implementation challenges. Results: Of 350 healthcare professionals, 300 completed both surveys. Confidence improved significantly across all technologies: VR simulators (2.8-4.2), metaverse platforms (3.1-4.0), and 3D display systems (3.2-4.3), all Discussion: Immersive technologies significantly enhance medical education and procedural training, demonstrating cross-regional applicability. Favorable feedback-based gains in user confidence underscore their transformative potential. Equitable adoption requires tackling systemic barriers through strategic investment, localized customization, and international collaboration. These findings offer actionable insights to inform policy and program development for digital healthcare transformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.