Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40989242›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Bridging the fair share gap for antibacterial innovation: an observational analysis of antibacterial revenues in the G7 and EU27.

Maple Goh, Matt McEnany, Rachel Freeman, Max Newton, Aaron S Kesselheim, Kevin Outterson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maple GohProgram on Regulation, Therapeutics and Law, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 1620 Tremont, Suite 3030, Boston, MA, 02120, United States.
Matt McEnanyUniversity of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 12850 East Montview Boulevard, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Rachel FreemanIQVIA, 37 North Wharf Road, London, W2 1AF, United Kingdom.
Max NewtonIQVIA, Kirschgartenstrasse 14, 4051, Basel, Switzerland.
Aaron S KesselheimProgram on Regulation, Therapeutics and Law, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 1620 Tremont, Suite 3030, Boston, MA, 02120, United States.
Kevin OuttersonBoston University School of Law, 765 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses an important global health challenge, including insufficient investment in research and development. This study quantifies the required "fair share" contributions from the G7+EU27 countries for an effective set of pull incentives for antibacterial research and development. Methods: Fair share targets within the G7+EU27 were calculated from GDP data and revenue targets from the literature, adjusted for inflation. Cefiderocol and ceftazidime-avibactam were selected as representative of key antibacterials. Revenues and volumes from IQVIA MIDAS data on these drugs were used to assess alignment with fair share targets. The study period was January 2015-December 2024. Findings: The G7+EU27 low-end, mid-range, and high-end annual revenue targets are US$258, US$363, and US$562 million in global revenues (USD 2024), respectively, consistently over ten years. An antibiotic meeting the mid-range target would be 230th in a global rank of drugs by revenues. While the UK and Italy are on track to meet annual mid-range targets going forward, other G7 countries are not, and only Italy has met cumulative mid-range targets for both drugs. Interpretation: Collectively, the G7+EU27 has not met cumulative mid-range targets. The UK meets mid-range annual targets going forward due to its antimicrobial subscription program. Italy meets mid-range targets due to higher use and may continue to meet them due to an "orphan" reimbursement fund for antibiotics. German, French, and Japanese antibacterial pull incentives have not met the mid-range targets. No G7 member meets high-end targets at current unit prices or volumes. A revenue guarantee pull incentive designed to top-up market revenues could support innovation and accelerate access without relying on higher prices or volumes. Progress in the UK and Italy demonstrates that meeting fair share targets are achievable within different national contexts. Funding: MG was supported by a post-doctoral fellowship at Boston University. ASK's work was funded by Arnold Ventures and International Collaborative Bioscience Innovation & Law Programme (Novo Nordisk Foundation grant number NNF23SA0087056). While KO is Executive Director of CARB-X, this work was not funded under any CARB-X grant.

Indexed as

AntibacterialInnovationPull incentivesPush incentivesResearch and development

Identifiers

PMID40989242
PMCPMC12452676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.