Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40989222›Full record

ArticleJournal of eye movement research2025

Interpretable Quantification of Scene-Induced Driver Visual Load: Linking Eye-Tracking Behavior to Road Scene Features via SHAP Analysis.

Jie Ni, Yifu Shao, Yiwen Guo, Yongqi Gu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of eye movement research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jie NiSchool of Automotive and Traffic Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China; yfshao1215@163.com (Y.S.); 18720885687@163.com (Y.G.); gyq3319524341@163.com (Y.G.).
Yifu ShaoSchool of Automotive and Traffic Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China; yfshao1215@163.com (Y.S.); 18720885687@163.com (Y.G.); gyq3319524341@163.com (Y.G.).
Yiwen GuoSchool of Automotive and Traffic Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China; yfshao1215@163.com (Y.S.); 18720885687@163.com (Y.G.); gyq3319524341@163.com (Y.G.).
Yongqi GuSchool of Automotive and Traffic Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China; yfshao1215@163.com (Y.S.); 18720885687@163.com (Y.G.); gyq3319524341@163.com (Y.G.).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Road traffic accidents remain a major global public health concern, where complex urban driving environments significantly elevate drivers' visual load and accident risks. Unlike existing research that adopts a macro perspective by considering multiple factors such as the driver, vehicle, and road, this study focuses on the driver's visual load, a key safety factor, and its direct source-the driver's visual environment. We have developed an interpretable framework combining computer vision and machine learning to quantify how road scene features influence oculomotor behavior and scene-induced visual load, establishing a complete and interpretable link between scene features, eye movement behavior, and visual load. Using the DR(eye)VE dataset, visual attention demand is established through occlusion experiments and confirmed to correlate with eye-tracking metrics. K-means clustering is applied to classify visual load levels based on discriminative oculomotor features, while semantic segmentation extracts quantifiable road scene features such as the Green Visibility Index, Sky Visibility Index and Street Canyon Enclosure. Among multiple machine learning models (Random Forest, Ada-Boost, XGBoost, and SVM), XGBoost demonstrates optimal performance in visual load detection. SHAP analysis reveals critical thresholds: the probability of high visual load increases when pole density exceeds 0.08%, signage surpasses 0.55%, or buildings account for more than 14%; while blink duration/rate decrease when street enclosure exceeds 38% or road congestion goes beyond 25%, indicating elevated visual load. The proposed framework provides actionable insights for urban design and driver assistance systems, advancing traffic safety through data-driven optimization of road environments.

Indexed as

driving visual loadexplainable AIhuman factorsroad traffic safetySHAP analysisurban designurban scenariovisual attention demand

Identifiers

PMID40989222
PMCPMC12452708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.