ArticleJournal of eye movement research2025
Interpretable Quantification of Scene-Induced Driver Visual Load: Linking Eye-Tracking Behavior to Road Scene Features via SHAP Analysis.
Article in Journal of eye movement research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Active Vision in Driving: Joint Modeling of Scanpaths and Risk Perception.Journal of eye movement research · 2026Article
- Integrating eye-tracking into psychometric research: computational approaches to explore response burden in questionnaire completion.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Road traffic accidents remain a major global public health concern, where complex urban driving environments significantly elevate drivers' visual load and accident risks. Unlike existing research that adopts a macro perspective by considering multiple factors such as the driver, vehicle, and road, this study focuses on the driver's visual load, a key safety factor, and its direct source-the driver's visual environment. We have developed an interpretable framework combining computer vision and machine learning to quantify how road scene features influence oculomotor behavior and scene-induced visual load, establishing a complete and interpretable link between scene features, eye movement behavior, and visual load. Using the DR(eye)VE dataset, visual attention demand is established through occlusion experiments and confirmed to correlate with eye-tracking metrics. K-means clustering is applied to classify visual load levels based on discriminative oculomotor features, while semantic segmentation extracts quantifiable road scene features such as the Green Visibility Index, Sky Visibility Index and Street Canyon Enclosure. Among multiple machine learning models (Random Forest, Ada-Boost, XGBoost, and SVM), XGBoost demonstrates optimal performance in visual load detection. SHAP analysis reveals critical thresholds: the probability of high visual load increases when pole density exceeds 0.08%, signage surpasses 0.55%, or buildings account for more than 14%; while blink duration/rate decrease when street enclosure exceeds 38% or road congestion goes beyond 25%, indicating elevated visual load. The proposed framework provides actionable insights for urban design and driver assistance systems, advancing traffic safety through data-driven optimization of road environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.