Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40989216›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction open2025

Accurate identification of abnormal ploidy using an artificial intelligence model in preimplantation genetic testing.

Pingyuan Xie, Rijing Pang, Luyao Zeng, Shuoping Zhang, Lei Sun, Kaisen Yang, Xiaoyi Yang, Shuang Zhou, Senlin Zhang, Guangjian Liu and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Pingyuan XieHunan Guangxiu Hospital, Hunan Normal University Health Science Center, Changsha, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0865-9526
Rijing PangHunan Guangxiu Hospital, Hunan Normal University Health Science Center, Changsha, China.
Luyao ZengHunan Guangxiu Hospital, Hunan Normal University Health Science Center, Changsha, China.
Shuoping ZhangClinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6866-7675
Lei SunPeking Jabrehoo Med Tech Co. Ltd, Beijing, China.
Kaisen YangHunan Guangxiu Hospital, Hunan Normal University Health Science Center, Changsha, China.
Xiaoyi YangClinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China.
Shuang ZhouNational Engineering and Research Center of Human Stem Cells, Changsha, China.
Senlin ZhangHunan Guangxiu Hospital, Hunan Normal University Health Science Center, Changsha, China.
Guangjian LiuPeking Jabrehoo Med Tech Co. Ltd, Beijing, China.
Yueqiu TanClinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China.
Liang HuClinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6984-834X
Fei GongClinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China.
Jia FeiPeking Jabrehoo Med Tech Co. Ltd, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4921-5702
Ge LinClinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3877-2546

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionCan ultra-low-coverage whole-genome sequencing (ulc-WGS) accurately identify abnormal ploidy during preimplantation genetic testing (PGT)? SUMMARY ANSWER: The artificial intelligence (AI)-based PGT-Plus model demonstrates high accuracy in ploidy detection, offering a cost-effective solution that enhances clinical utility of PGT. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The predominant PGT for aneuploidy can identify chromosomal aneuploidies but cannot determine ploidy status. Transferring embryos with ploidy abnormalities can result in miscarriage and molar pregnancy. On the other hand, in ART, fertilization is assessed by morphological pronuclear assessment at the zygote stage. However, it has a low specificity in the prediction of abnormal ploidy status and embryos deemed abnormally fertilized can yield healthy pregnancies. Accurately identified abnormal ploidy in PGT-A can resolve current limitations and expand the utility range of PGT-A. Several studies have identified ploidy abnormalities; however, they were mainly based on single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays or needed to combine additional targeted-next-generation sequencing (NGS) information. Studies based on ulc-WGS remain scarce. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: The study consisted of two stages: methodology establishment and validation. An AI model, named PGT-Plus, was developed using 653 samples with known ploidy status, which was further validated using 792 different ploidy status samples. In the clinical application stage, the approach was used to analyse the ploidy status of 19 103 normally fertilized PGT blastocysts and 140 single pronucleus (1PN)-derived blastocysts collected between May 2022 and December 2023. All blastocysts were tested using trophectoderm biopsy and NGS. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING

methodsThe methodology is based on the ulc-WGS data. First, based on samples with known ploidy status: the heterozygosity rate of high-frequency biallelic SNPs, the likelihood ratio (LLR) of alleles was calculated under different assumptions ('both parental homologs' [BPH] from a single parent, 'single parental homolog' [SPH] from each parent, disomy, and monosomy) by leveraging allele frequencies and linkage disequilibrium (LD) measured in the 1000 genomes project database. Twenty-three continuous candidate features derived from heterozygosity rates and LLRs of chromosomes or selected windows were included to establish the ploidy prediction AI model. Gini importance analysis and multicollinearity mitigation was performed for feature selection, then the performance of Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Logistic Regression for modelling was compared. Subsequently, the parameter optimization was performed based on the RF model. Ploidy constitution concordance was evaluated in known ploidy status samples. The frequency of abnormal ploidy in normal fertilized PGT blastocysts and 1PN-derived blastocysts (including conventional IVF and ICSI) was evaluated. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Eleven features were collected for model architecture compared to SVM and Logistic Regression; RF achieved superior performance for ploidy detection. The AI model achieved an AUC of 1 for genome-wide-uniparental diploidy (GW-UPD), 1 for triploidy, and 0.99 for diploidy. For the 792 validation samples, 99.5% of samples were successfully detected using the AI model, and the model showed 100% accuracy for ploidy classification. In the clinical application stage, out of 19 103 PGT samples, 19 069 were successfully analysed using the model, with 110 (0.57%) identified as having abnormal ploidy embryos. Among these, 12.7% (14/110) were identified as GW-UPD, and 87.3% (96/110) were triploid. Among 5563 diploid blastocysts transferred, 3478 clinical pregnancies were achieved. Subsequent ploidy analysis was performed for 217 spontaneous abortion and 935 prenatal diagnostic samples, and no abnormal ploidy was identified. Furthermore, of the 140 1PN embryos tested, 40 (28.6%) exhibited GW-UPD, 3 (2.1%) exhibited triploidy, and 97 (69.3%) were determined to be biparental and normally fertilized. Among the 97 biparental embryos, 46 were diploid, 11 were mosaic, and 40 were aneuploid. In terms of the insemination pattern, the percentage of abnormal ploidy in ICSI was significantly higher than in conventional IVF ( LARGE-SCALE DATA: N/A. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: Some rare ploidy abnormalities, such as polyploidy with an equal number of identical sets of chromosomes and ploidy mosaicism cannot be accurately identified. Moreover, the origin of abnormal ploidy was not identified due to the unavailability of DNA from both parents. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsThe PGT-Plus AI model provides a ploidy evaluation method based on the conventional PGT-A data and integrates directly into standard PGT-A workflows. Clinical utility results suggest that the model is a valuable tool for identifying embryos with abnormal ploidy in PGT-A and rescuing normal diploid embryos from abnormally fertilized embryos. These findings demonstrate that PGT-Plus significantly enhances the diagnostic accuracy of PGT. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was supported by grants from Major Scientific Program of CITIC Group (No. 2023ZXKYB34100, to Ge.L.), Hunan Provincial Grant for Innovative Province Construction (2019SK4012), Hunan Xiangjiang New District (Changsha High-tech Zone) key core technology research project in 2023, and Science Foundation of Hunan Province (Grant 2023JJ30422). All authors declared no conflicts of interest..

Indexed as

artificial intelligencegenome-wide uniparental diploidypreimplantation genetic testingsingle pronucleus-derived embryostriploidytripronucleate embryo

Identifiers

PMID40989216
PMCPMC12453672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.