ArticleRwanda journal of medicine and health sciences2025
Factors Associated with Cervical Cancer Screening among Women at Selected District Hospital, Rwanda.
Article in Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Congenital Heart Defect Screening Among Children with Down Syndrome in Rwanda: A Cross-Sectional Study.Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cervical cancer remains a significant public health concern, particularly in low and middle-income countries. Despite the availability of screening services, uptake remains low. This study assessed cervical cancer screening prevalence and associated factors among women at Masaka Hospital. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 337 women aged 18-50 years at Masaka Hospital's outpatient department. Participants were selected using systematic random sampling. Data were collected via pre-tested, interviewer-administered questionnaires. The chi-square test was used to determine the association of the factors (independent variables) with screening uptake (dependent variable). In contrast, quantification of the association was done using logistic regression analysis. Results: The prevalence of cervical cancer screening was 32.94%. Limited health education (AOR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.350-0.956) and fear of pain (AOR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.373-0.970) significantly reduced screening likelihood. Age, education level, and employment status also influenced participation. Conclusion: Screening uptake remains low, highlighting the need for awareness campaigns and community outreach. Addressing misconceptions and reducing fear through education can enhance participation. Collaboration among healthcare providers, policymakers, and community leaders is crucial to increasing screening rates and reducing the burden of cervical cancer in Rwanda.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.