ArticleChild protection and practice2025
Subjective well-being of Kenyan children reunified with families from residential care institutions: A closer look at child disability.
Article in Child protection and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Living in residential care has been well documented as causing harm to children in some parts of the world, especially children with disabilities. However, very little empirical research has looked at the intersection of child disability and living in residential care in Kenya or elsewhere in Sub-Saharan Africa. Objective: To examine how the subjective well-being of children who reunified with family after living in residential care may vary by child disability status, as well as by other child characteristics such as orphanhood status. Participants and Setting: Children aged 11 to 17 receiving services from an initiative that oversaw the reunification of children from residential care into families in three counties in Kenya. Methods: We drew upon a cross-sectional household survey of N = 105 children and conducted multiple linear regressions with clustered errors that controlled control for child sex, age, and time since family reunification. Findings: Children with disabilities, who comprised 13 % of the sample, had lower self-reported well-being in the domains of basic needs, leisure and freedom, and care and safety, and a larger decrease in life satisfaction after reunification, compared to children without disabilities. Conclusion: Further research must examine reasons for this lower well-being, and policymakers should strengthen supports for children with disabilities who are reunifying with families after living in residential care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.