ReviewJournal of orthopaedic translation2025
3D bioprinting bone/cartilage organoids: construction, applications, and challenges.
Review in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering high-fidelity bone organoids: Operational classification, multilineage crosstalk, biofabrication evidence, and translational validation.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Black phosphorus/calcium silicate-functionalized 3D hierarchical scaffolds: Coupling photothermal therapy with ion microenvironment-induced mineralization for bone repair.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- DLP bioprinting of cartilage organoid-laden bioinks yields high-fidelity auricular constructs with enhanced chondrogenesis.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Article
- From microtissues to macro solutions - The future of scalable and automated cartilage tissue engineering.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
- Decoding triple negative breast cancer bone metastasis: from 3D bioprinted models to clinical translation.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Challenges and Strategies in Hydrogel-Based Cartilage Regeneration.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Bone Organoids: A Novel Tool for Modeling and Managing Skeletal Disorders in Diabetes.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Review
- Osteogenic Potential of 3D Bioprinted Collagen Scaffolds Enriched with Bone Marrow Stromal Cells, BMP-2, and Hydroxyapatite in a Rabbit Calvarial Defect Model.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Advances and Challenges in 3D Bioprinting of Cartilage Organoids: From Material Innovation to Functional Regeneration.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Advancing the 3Rs in bone tissue engineering: emergingFrontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Recent advances in organoids and organs-on-chips for accelerating orthopaedic innovation and translation.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Article
- Engineering osteoporosis-related bone organoids: a mechanism-module-functional readout framework for disease modelling and biomarker translation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Review
- Review
- Redefining orthopaedic translation: Harnessing multi-omics, smart biomaterials, and regenerative immunomodulation.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orthopaedic disorders, such as osteoporosis and osteoarthritis, impose substantial suffering upon an increasing population, driving demand for accurate disease models. Bone/cartilage organoids offer a promising solution by replicating complex 3D microstructures and multi-cellular niches, overcoming limitations of 2D models and animal experiments. 3D bioprinting, an additive manufacturing technology, enables the spatially precise deposition of cells and bioactive materials, facilitating efficient construction of organoids with enhanced structural fidelity. Therefore, this review specifically focuses on bone and cartilage organoids constructed using 3D bioprinting technologies. We summarize the prevailing 3D bioprinting techniques and biomaterials employed, critically analyze the unique advantages of bioprinting for creating these organoids, explore current technical challenges, such as standardization and scalability, and discuss future research directions. By addressing current progress and key issues in bioprinting bone/cartilage organoids, this review aims to accelerate their standardization and application as powerful platforms for multiscale disease modeling, drug screening, and regenerative medicine strategies. The translational potential of this article: Bone/cartilage organoids constructed via 3D bioprinting, through precise recapitulation of bone and cartilage tissue microenvironment and physiology, enable multiscale disease modeling from localized pathologies to systemic responses, despite persisting unresolved challenges in reproducibility and stability. This review highlights their clinical translational value and elucidates the driven role of 3D bioprinting in accelerating their clinical adoption, particularly in regenerative medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.