Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40989065›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025

Visual and Refractive Outcomes of a New Monofocal, Non-Constant Aberration-Correcting Aspheric Intraocular Lens.

Smita Agarwal, Erin Thornell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Smita Agarwal *Wollongong Eye Specialists, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0009-0007-8311-3017
Erin Thornell *Wollongong Eye Specialists, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To assess early visual and refractive outcomes of the CT Lucia 621PY intraocular lens (IOL). Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed for 47 consecutive eyes from 33 patients following routine phacoemulsification and implantation of CT Lucia 621PY monofocal IOLs for the treatment of cataract. Postoperative analysis was performed 6-weeks following surgery. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA) and manifest refraction were measured for all patients. Uncorrected mesopic contrast sensitivity (CS) was measured for a subset of 22 of the 47 eyes, and modulated transfer function (MTF) and angle alpha and angle kappa were measured for a separate subset of 19 eyes. Results: Mean spherical equivalent (SE) was -0.04±0.38 D, with 83% of eyes achieving within ±0.5 D of the refractive target. Mean UDVA was 0.05±0.1 LogMAR at 6 weeks postoperative, with 98% of eyes achieving 0.2 LogMAR or better. Mean BCVA was -0.02±0.06 LogMAR, with 87% of eyes achieving 0.00 LogMAR or better. Mean mesopic monocular CS was 1.4±0.26 sec arc, and 50% contrast was maintained at a spatial frequency of approximately 13 cycles per degree. There was no significant correlation between MTF and angle alpha or angle kappa. Conclusion: The CT Lucia 621PY offers good visual and refractive outcomes. While there was no significant correlation between angle alpha or angle kappa and visual quality, further investigation is warranted.

Indexed as

alpha and kappa anglescataract surgerymonofocal intraocular lensnon-constant aberration IOL

Identifiers

PMID40989065
PMCPMC12453047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.