ReviewAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2025
Telemedicine for the detection and management of in-hospital and out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest: Status quo and quo vadis.
Review in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Telemedicine has revolutionised healthcare by enabling the remote delivery of medical services through secure communication technologies. In cardiology, telemedicine has become invaluable for early diagnosis, emergency care, and chronic disease management, addressing challenges like cost and geographic barriers. Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA), a leading cause of mortality, represents a potential area for telemedicine application, though evidence supporting its direct impact on survival remains limited. Despite resuscitation advancements, SCA survival remains under 5 %, primarily due to delayed diagnosis and treatment. Emerging tools-such as wearable sensors, mobile applications, and artificial intelligence-show promise in early warning sign detection; however, most studies remain preliminary, and large-scale validation is lacking. In cases of in-hospital cardiac arrest, telemedicine supports real-time consultations with remote experts. It facilitates adherence to clinical protocols, reduces treatment delays, and integrates cognitive aids to optimize resuscitation efforts. However, existing trials have yielded mixed results, and questions remain regarding feasibility, staffing models, and effective integration during acute events. Telemedicine strengthens the "chain of survival" for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest through telecommunicator cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), boosting bystander CPR rates and improving survival chances. Nevertheless, concerns about added delays, first-responder coordination, and variability in system infrastructure remain critical barriers. Post-resuscitation, telemedicine networks enable evidence-based interventions such as targeted temperature management, demonstrating feasibility and effectiveness in emergency settings. Moreover, remote monitoring of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators ensures timely care while reducing outpatient clinic burdens. Integrating artificial intelligence enhances telemedicine's potential by enabling personalized care and predictive analytics. However, limited physical examinations, technical issues, and data privacy concerns persist. Furthermore, restricted physical examinations, infrastructure limitations, and data privacy risks continue to hinder the broader adoption of telemedicine. While telemedicine holds potential to reduce mortality in high-risk scenarios like SCA, its current utility is constrained by technological, logistical, and systemic barriers. Continued research, targeted implementation strategies, and evidence-based integration into emergency care pathways are essential to realize its transformative promise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.