ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia. Behavior & socioeconomics of aging2025
Cognitive data harmonization across two racially diverse cohorts in the United States.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia. Behavior & socioeconomics of aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Blood mitochondrial heteroplasmic variants and cognitive performance in late midlife: REGARDS study.BMC neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionFew cohorts have sufficient diversity to identify drivers of racial disparities in cognitive aging. Pooling data from different samples can increase sample size and diversity.
methodsWe statistically harmonized cognitive function data from two US cohorts: 2010 Health and Retirement Study (HRS; n=18,422) and 2009-2013 Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke waves (REGARDS; n=19,690). We used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to derive harmonized scores for general and domain-specific cognitive function, leveraging common cognitive test items across studies and retaining those unique to each study. We assessed validity of the cognitive scores by regressing them on age, sex/gender, and education.
resultsThe combined sample had a mean age of 67.69 (SD=10.22) years. CFA models had good fit. Harmonized cognitive scores demonstrated good criterion validity. DISCUSSION: Pooled analyses of harmonized cognitive scores are a feasible means to increase cohort diversity for understanding drivers of racial disparities in cognitive aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.