Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40988990›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2025

Magnetomyographic evaluation of motor unit size that is robust to changes in distance to sensor.

Tai Otani, Miho Akaza, Shigenori Kawabata, Hirokazu Natsui, Taishi Watanabe, Yuki Miyano, Ryoichi Hanazawa, Yoshiaki Adachi, Kensuke Sekihara, Tadashi Kanouchi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tai OtaniDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Science, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan.
Miho AkazaDepartment of Clinical Information Applied Science, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan.
Shigenori KawabataDepartment of Advanced Technology in Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan.
Hirokazu NatsuiDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Science, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan.
Taishi WatanabeRICOH Futures BU, RICOH Company, Ltd., Tokyo 143-8555, Japan.
Yuki MiyanoRICOH Futures BU, RICOH Company, Ltd., Tokyo 143-8555, Japan.
Ryoichi HanazawaDepartment of Clinical Biostatistics, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan.
Yoshiaki AdachiApplied Electronics Laboratory, Kanazawa Institute of Technology, Nonoichi 921-8501, Japan.
Kensuke SekiharaDepartment of Advanced Technology in Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan.
Tadashi KanouchiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan.
Takanori YokotaDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Science, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In clinical practice, motor unit (MU) size is evaluated using needle electromyography to diagnose the cause of muscle weakness, whether myogenic or neurogenic. However, needle electromyography is influenced by the conductance of the muscle tissue and the distance from the MU to the electrode. In contrast, the magnetic field generated by a skeletal muscle is not distorted by subcutaneous tissues because their magnetic permeability is considered equal to that of free space. Therefore, we hypothesized that MU amplitude can be measured via magnetic field recordings. We tested this hypothesis by recording MU activity in the abductor pollicis brevis muscle. We then evaluated the MU size difference between healthy individuals and patients with spinal muscular atrophy and spinal-bulbar muscular atrophy. Furthermore, we assessed whether our method could consistently evaluate the MU size regardless of the sensor-muscle distance. Myomagnetic fields of single MUs evoked by electrical stimulation of the median nerve were measured. We used a biomagnetometer equipped with 132-channel superconducting quantum interference device sensors orientated upwards and arrayed on a quasi-planar surface. We applied a spatial filtering method that can estimate the current distribution from the magnetic field even for a conductor with unknown configuration or conductivity distribution and that does not require an a priori assumption of how many source currents are present. We visualized the electrical activity of 12 MUs of the abductor pollicis brevis muscle from eight healthy individuals and of two MUs from two patients with spinal muscular atrophy and spinal-bulbar muscular atrophy. Four current patterns were identified in the MU electrical activity. In all MUs, current towards the innervation zone was observed just after the start of activities. We called this current 'initial muscle-directing current'. At the same time, currents directed proximally and distally from the middle of the muscle were observed in most MUs. Initial muscle-directing current was more than 3 or 10 times larger in patients with spinal muscular atrophy and spinal-bulbar muscular atrophy than in healthy individuals. Initial muscle-directing current was estimated to weaken by 5.5% for every 5-mm increase in distance from the sensor array. Initial muscle-directing current is considered to reflect the activity near the neuromuscular junction and can be an index of MU size. The results confirmed our hypothesis that MU amplitude can be evaluated using magnetic measurements. This novel and non-invasive magnetomyography method can evaluate MU size with little influence of distance and has the potential to supersede needle electromyography.

Indexed as

magnetomyographymotor unit sizeneurogenic changespatial filtering methodsuperconducting quantum interference device

Identifiers

PMID40988990
PMCPMC12451695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.