Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40988974›Full record

ArticleJournal of brachial plexus and peripheral nerve injury2025

Use of a Pedicled Vascularized Ulnar Nerve as a Long Graft for Complete Brachial Plexus Palsy in Adults to Restore Elbow Flexion: Should this Practice Continue?

Camille Echalier, Jean Noël Goubier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of brachial plexus and peripheral nerve injury, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Camille EchalierNerve and Brachial Plexus Surgery Institute, Paris, France.
Jean Noël GoubierNerve and Brachial Plexus Surgery Institute, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5784-2741

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restoring elbow flexion is a priority in adults with complete brachial plexus palsy. If the nerve root is not avulsed, a graft can be placed between the existing root and the musculocutaneous nerve. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of using vascularized ulnar nerve grafts in this context. Our case series consisted of 17 male and 3 female patients (mean age of 31 years) presenting complete brachial plexus palsy after a motorcycle accident. A graft at the C5 or C6 root on the musculocutaneous nerve was done in all patients using a pedicled vascularized ulnar nerve to restore elbow flexion at a mean of 5 months after the accident. At a mean follow-up of more than 3 years, elbow flexion was graded as M4 in six patients and between M0 and M2 in the other 14 patients on the Medical Research Council scale. None of the patients had M3 strength. While the results of long grafts using a vascularized ulnar nerve are disappointing in this case series, they are consistent with previous publications. Encouraging results have only been reported with short grafts (<10 cm), which can rarely be used with supraclavicular lesions. For this reason, we currently prefer using a sural nerve graft or nerve transfer, when possible, to restore elbow flexion in adult patients with brachial plexus injuries.

Indexed as

allograftbrachial plexusnerve graftvascularized ulnar nerve

Identifiers

PMID40988974
PMCPMC12453903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.