ArticleCureus2025
Enhancing Adherence to British Thoracic Society Guidelines for Follow-Up Chest Radiographs in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Quality Improvement Project.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCommunity-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common respiratory infection in adults, associated with significant morbidity and mortality, particularly among hospitalized patients. National guidelines recommend follow-up chest radiographs (CXRs) for patients with persistent symptoms or elevated risk of occult malignancy, such as smokers or those aged over 50 years. However, inconsistent adherence to these protocols, often due to process-related barriers, necessitates quality improvement initiatives to enhance patient care and reduce diagnostic delays. An internal audit identified poor compliance, prompting this quality improvement project (QIP).
objectiveTo evaluate and improve adherence to British Thoracic Society/National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance for approximately six-week follow-up CXR after CAP using a two-cycle QIP. The primary objective was to improve CXR completion compared with baseline (32%) toward the ≥90% audit standard. Secondary objectives were to increase Virtual Pneumonia Clinic (VPC) referrals and Critical Alert System (CAS) inclusions. These aims were measurable, time-bound, and guideline-aligned, consistent with SMART framing.
methodsA retrospective two-cycle audit in a UK ED was conducted. Cycle 1 included 50 adults with radiologically confirmed CAP (1 November 2023-3 March 2024). Outcomes were completion of a follow-up CXR at approximately six weeks, referral to a VPC (consultant-led virtual follow-up for CAP imaging/clinical review), and inclusion of CAS (electronic, closed-loop radiology alert tool for urgent/safety-critical results with mandatory acknowledgement). Although VPC and CAS are UK-specific labels, their functions, i.e., telehealth follow-up for higher-risk CAP and closed-loop radiology alerts with mandatory acknowledgement, are internationally applicable and align with American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America and best-practice results communication guidance. A multi-component eight-week intervention bundle was implemented (11 March-5 May 2024), comprising staff education, enhanced electronic discharge documentation with mandatory prompts, multilingual patient information leaflets, and a standardized CAS with electronic routing to the named requester. Cycle 2 re-audited 50 consecutive eligible adults (31 March-31 July 2024), and the impact of interventions was assessed.
resultsCycle 1 showed follow-up completion of 16/50 (32%; 95% CI: 21-46), VPC referral of 12/50 (24%; 95% CI: 14-37), and CAS inclusion of 3/50 (6%; 95% CI: 2-16). Cycle 2 showed follow-up completion of 35/50 (70%; 95% CI: 56-81; χ² p<0.001), VPC referral of 38/50 (76%; 95% CI: 63-86; χ² p<0.001), and CAS inclusion of 36/50 (72%; 95% CI: 58-83; χ² p<0.001). Among ED-discharged patients who completed follow-up, ED-initiated CXR follow-up requests increased from 5/12 (42%; 95% CI: 19-68) to 24/28 (86%; 95% CI: 69-94; Fisher's exact p=0.008). No obvious unintended effects (alert fatigue or workload escalation) were observed during the study period.
conclusionA low-cost, multi-component intervention produced statistically significant gains in adherence to follow-up CXR after CAP in our ED (from 16/50 (32%) to 35/50 (70%)). Embedding education, mandatory discharge prompts, patient information, and robust alerting workflows was feasible and scalable. Continued monitoring and iterative optimization are required to achieve and sustain the prespecified ≥90% compliance standard.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.