ArticleClinical case reports2025
Cleidocranial Dysplasia: A Case Report Highlighting Dental, Craniofacial, and Skeletal Complexity.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cleidocranial Dysplasia: A Case Report Highlighting Dental, Craniofacial, and Skeletal Complexity.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cleidocranial dysplasia (CCD) is a rare congenital skeletal disorder characterized by clavicular hypoplasia, craniofacial anomalies, and complex dental abnormalities, commonly caused by RUNX2 gene mutations. This report describes a 25-year-old female who presented with acute dental pain. Clinical examination revealed short stature, frontal bossing, open fontanelles, and retained primary teeth. Radiographic assessments, including panoramic radiography, chest X-ray, and cone-beam computed tomography, confirmed the presence of clavicular hypoplasia, multiple impacted and supernumerary teeth, Wormian bones, and delayed tooth eruption. Quantitative analysis of the panoramic radiograph was performed using established diagnostic criteria, including zygomatic arch downward bend, distance between coronoid and condyle, and best-fit gonial circle measurements, which further supported the diagnosis. A definitive diagnosis of CCD was made based on clinical and radiological findings in the absence of genetic confirmation. Emergency root canal treatment was performed to relieve acute irreversible pulpitis in tooth 46. Although genetic testing and definitive surgical-orthodontic rehabilitation were not pursued due to socioeconomic constraints, the case highlights the importance of conventional imaging in reaching a diagnosis in low-resource settings. It highlights the importance of early recognition and multidisciplinary care to address functional, aesthetic, and psychosocial challenges associated with CCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.