ArticleFrontiers in genetics2025
Comprehensive analysis and validation of angiogenesis in vascular dementia from the perspective of diagnosis, prevention, and treatment.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Angiogenesis is a critical pathological process in vascular dementia (VD), yet current therapeutic strategies targeting this mechanism remain limited. Identifying novel molecular pathways involved in angiogenesis holds significant promise for advancing both diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for VD. Methods: We first applied weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA) and differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis, combined with phenotypic gene database mining, to identify angiogenesis-associated genes in VD. We then used the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression to select key diagnostic genes. The diagnostic efficacy of these genes was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, while their association with immune cell infiltration was assessed via xCell immunoinfiltration. Using single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq), we determined the cellular distribution of key genes and applied Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) to analyze functional pathways in the differentially expressed cell clusters. Finally, we validated gene expression changes in the hippocampus of bilateral common carotid artery occlusion (BCCAO)-induced VD rats using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and Western blot (WB). Results: Ultimately, we screened five key genes, namely, Conclusion: These five key genes might be used as angiogenesis diagnostic genes for VD and might be novel potential targets for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.