ArticleResuscitation plus2025
Traumatic cardiac arrest in older adults in the United States.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prehospital management and outcomes of traumatic cardiac arrest in older adults: a French nationwide registry study.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Reporting of Utstein-recommended variables in prehospital traumatic cardiac arrest: a scoping review.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Traumatic cardiac arrest is associated with lower survival rates compared with other arrest etiologies. Relatively little research has examined potential variation in traumatic cardiac arrest parameters as a function of patient age. We hypothesize that traumatic cardiac arrest in the older adult population may be appreciably different with regards to demographics and clinical features from traumatic cardiac arrest in other age groups. Methods: We examined a nationally-representative database of emergency medical services (EMS) activations in the United States (NEMSIS). We included all adult (≥18 years) out-of-hospital cardiac arrests responded to by ground ambulance EMS crews in 2022 and 2023 documented as having a traumatic etiology. Arrests were grouped based on whether they involved adult patients (18-60 years) or older adult patients (61+ years) based on pre-existing classifications within the dataset. Key arrest data were compared across the two groups using two-tailed two-proportion z-tests; significance was defined as Results: Across 10,573 older adult (61+ years) traumatic cardiac arrests and 34,203 adult (18-60 years) traumatic cardiac arrests, traumatic cardiac arrests in older adults were less likely to be witnessed (35.9 % vs. 39.5 %; Conclusion: Our analysis of a large and nationally-representative database of EMS activations in the United States reveals traumatic cardiac arrest in older adults is associated with several key differences. Further study is needed to identify potential mechanisms underpinning these differences and develop approaches to mitigate the risk of traumatic cardiac arrest across all ages.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.