ArticleCureus2025
Surgical Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic-Assisted Approaches for Stage I Endometrial Cancer: Insights From a Real-World Study by the Indian Gynecologic-Onco Study Group.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Among Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Surgeries in Women with Obesity Diagnosed with Endometrial Cancer: Results from a Quaternary Hospital in Thailand.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is limited clinical evidence from India comparing robotic-assisted surgery (RAS), laparoscopic surgery (LPS), and open laparotomy (OL) approaches for managing stage 1 endometrial cancer (EC). This multicenter study aimed to evaluate and compare the perioperative and short-term outcomes of these techniques across high-volume Indian institutions. METHODOLOGY: This multicenter, retrospective, non-randomized comparative study reviewed medical records of consecutive patients who underwent OL, LPS, or RAS for stage 1 EC between January 2010 and December 2023.
resultsA total of 2,090 patient records were analyzed, including 1,223 in the RAS group, 451 in the LPS group, and 416 in the OL group. The average age was 59.66 ± 9.31 years, with no significant differences between groups. The overall mean operative time was 220.51 ± 93.73 minutes, with the RAS group demonstrating a significantly shorter duration than both OL and LPS groups (
conclusionsThis study reports the first multicentric evidence for RAS in Indian settings, compared to conventional approaches, and offers encouraging outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.