ArticleCureus2025
Three Cases of Indirect Decompression Failure Following Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Requiring Early Direct Posterior Decompression: Analysis of Etiologies and Literature Review.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present three cases of indirect decompression failure (IDF) following oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF). Additional direct posterior decompression (DPD) was performed within a week of the initial procedure to alleviate persistent or deteriorating symptoms due to nerve compression. The IDF incidence rate among patients with lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent OLIF at our institution was 1.8% (three out of 211 patients). Two elderly women (aged 80 and 81) sustained an endplate injury (EPI) and a minor vertebral fracture, followed by cage subsidence, due to untreated osteoporosis during the perioperative period. This resulted in a 43% and 10% decrease in the cross-sectional spinal canal area (CSA), respectively, compared to the preoperative value, leading to neurological deterioration. The third case involved a 74-year-old man with bony foraminal stenosis that could not be alleviated by OLIF, resulting in residual radiculopathy. The effectiveness of indirect decompression via OLIF procedures for patients with severe central stenosis remains a topic of debate. If it is supposed to be effective, the absence of subsequent cage subsidence following OLIF is considered a crucial prerequisite. Although bony foraminal and lateral recess stenosis were significant risk factors for IDF following OLIF in our case analysis as in previous reports, there are few effective parameters with which to predict IDF. Further studies should establish quantitative and integrated thresholds for the predictive parameters of IDF, particularly in conjunction with preoperative CSA and cross-sectional foraminal area (CFA), the restoration of posterior disc height (PDH) during surgery, the Marchi grading system for cage subsidence, and the severity of osteoporosis as indicated by the CT-Hounsfield unit values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.