ArticleCureus2025
Interprofessional Team Performance in Pediatric Settings: Analyzing Reflections of Quality Improvement (QI)-Trained Medical Students.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Navigating interprofessional team dynamics is essential for high-quality patient care in pediatric settings. This study involved medical students on a pediatric clerkship who explored the characteristics of high- and low-performing clinical teams by considering drivers and barriers to effective team performance. By analyzing these reflections, the study aimed to identify key facilitators and barriers to effective team-based care. Methods Survey evaluations and narrative reflections were completed by third-year students (M3s) at a single US allopathic medical school during their pediatric clerkship after receiving training in TeamSTEPPS® and Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) Open School, two programs that support quality improvement (QI) in healthcare. Descriptive statistical and inductive thematic analyses were conducted on the resulting 183 narratives. A valence rating system was employed to quantify narrative responses as positive/attractive or negative/aversive, with a Cronbach alpha of 0.958 between two independent reviewers. Results Inductive thematic analysis generated 40 themes that we grouped under the five TeamSTEPPS® skill domains (situation monitoring, communication, leadership, team structure, mutual support) into thematic conceptual models. High-performing teams demonstrated open communication, role clarity, shared understanding, and organized task delegation. Low-performing teams displayed a lack of information exchange, uncertain team roles, unhealthy power dynamics, and disorganized task delegation. Conclusions After instruction in QI methods, pediatric clerkship students identified consistent drivers of and barriers to effective team performance. The themes within the narrative reflections can provide insights into improving patient care delivery, specifically around situation monitoring, communication, and team structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.